View Single Post
  #64  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:34 AM
sellthekids sellthekids is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: taking all make-ups
Posts: 29
Default Re: \"True M\" vs. Harrington\'s M: Critical Flaws in Harrington\'s M Theo

it's probably been said in various ways in previous posts, but to clarify:

didn't Harrington not only ask you to compute your M, but to also know your opponents'?

M is a tool used to determine relative stack size & strength in relation to blinds/antes and your opponents, right?

i make plays (bets, steals, bluffs, etc) not only based on my opponent's previous plays and my interpretation of his skill, but also based on his stack and his opinion of his position, with regards to M. do you ever bluff a guy with an M of 30+ when you have an M of 10-? i would expect to get called down a lot....

ps - Sherman, nice avatar, from one Sig Ep to another (TX Rho)
Reply With Quote