[mikech]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i just want the cardroom to enforce its rules--it's the dealer's job to run the game, so when player A put more money on the table during the hand, he should've been told he can't.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is ta trait of a nit. "I want rules enforced because they are rules. Period end of discussion."

Question for you.

Who was injured in this scenario?

[/ QUOTE ]
i've been injured. let me explain.

you are confused about my position on this issue. i don't care in the slightest about the rule itself, i just want to KNOW what the rule actually IS. if you're telling me the rule is that players can SUSPEND table-stakes as long as they agree to it, fantastic! then that's the rule i'll play by! it would essentially be infinitely +ev for me.

i've been injured insofar as i wasn't aware of the true nature of this rule until now. i'm also injured if you allow the players in THIS hand to do it, but DON'T allow me to do it (and by "it" i mean ask my opponent if he's willing to let me add money to my stack) when i'm holding the dead nuts on the river in an uncapped nl game.

so, just to make sure, you're saying that (in some casinos) the table-stakes rule can be suspended if the players in the hand all consent, correct?