Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
unfortunately, a lack of a positive test does not prove innocence, as strange as that sounds.
[/ QUOTE ]
I agree that a test cannot constitute a negative proof, but only the abscence affirmative proof in the contrary.
In short, those who poo-poo the negative tests are relying on the inability of anyone to prove the existence of a negative, in order to hold onto their positions, despite them being in the abscence of any affirmitave proof of their own.
[ QUOTE ]
if you have no or insignificant tests for the PED in question, the fact that you were tested means little.
[/ QUOTE ]
FWIW, the tests administered in 2003 & 2004 could detect 'the clear'.
[/ QUOTE ]
Another lie. A test did exist for THG in 2003 but MLB did not test for it
|