[delta k]

Why give the stat trolls something to find fault in? If he does something good it's a fluke, according to them, and if he doesn't do something it's what they expected- thus they can't ever be wrong! Which is why it used to be fun to bother them with facts, relevant statistics, etc. but now I just ignore them.

Even if Morneau topped Schneids' line, what are they going to say? 'uh, it was a fluke, won't happen again'. Lol.