Re: My throughts of Phil Gordans DVD and Little green book.
[ QUOTE ]
He also said that in the end that this book wasn't suppossed to be a math book, but I really think that he had to make some EV calculations to proof that some of the play he made was correct. I generally agree with the way he plays, but he doesn't argue a lot why that is the best way to play.
[/ QUOTE ]
My impression of the book was that Gordon mentions early in the book he is specifically letting the reader know how he plays. I'm not sure it was meant to be a book on how best to play, so there was no need for him to argue his point.
I believe he mentions he is not the best player, but he is a winning player and this is how he plays for the most part. He says if you disagree with what he says, that is good. LGB was not intended to be a definitive guide on the game. He wrote the book to allow readers to see how a winning professional plays.
|