Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
It's not really fit for a professor to conclude anything on such a small sample size. The average religious/superstitious poker player has irrational beliefs about chance and math, and therefore will achieve less in long term poker.
In short term it's surely possible to win anything, these last 2 WSOP's have clearly proven that. I don't see why Sklansky would have to concede anything on this matter.
|