[yourface]

[ QUOTE ]
I had audio distortion and delay issues with this video. Sound that gets warped during compression is one of the most abrasive sounds to the ear, so you might want to troubleshoot that.

[/ QUOTE ]
I noticed a bit of a delay but no distortion. maybe something happened when I uploaded it to DC. I really have no idea what I'm doing when it comes to AV stuff but I will download a copy off DC and see what is up

[ QUOTE ]
Starting at 3:00, A2o isolate and unimproved betdown: whoa. Alien territory to me. Worthy of a thread.

[/ QUOTE ]
his ATSB is around 60% so I definately want to defend here. I am around even money preflop and with dead money from the BB + initiative + postflop edge I can definately play on. I had some history with this dude and I really expected him to raise me on the flop or turn with a pair or strong draw, so by the river I narrowed his hand range down to Ax or Kx. vs that range the river is a VB.

[ QUOTE ]
Did you plan to call 44 down vs. a turn checkraise at 13:25? Good bet regardless.

[/ QUOTE ]
yea I would have. pretty sure he would c/r me on the flop with a good pair or strong draw so when he c/r that turn I'd be very suspicious that he just picked up a flush draw

[ QUOTE ]
Curious about the snap semibluff lead with 82s 4-way against this crew. Guess the board was dry enough to get it HU and have a profitable turn bluff.

[/ QUOTE ]
yes, if I can narrow it to 1 player I can semibluff the turn, and if a bunch of people come along it is +EV for me. I think checking is good too, mix it up

[ QUOTE ]
88 at 14:30: Have you given more thought to the ideal line here? Checkcall, donk turn?

[/ QUOTE ]
not really. I think that would be the best play though in this spot, curious what others think

[ QUOTE ]
You say top set if checkraised on KT67A three-flush is an clear 3-bet against the weirdo preflop capper who doesn't know how to valuebet rivers. Are QJ and slowplayed flushes that far off the mark? Granted we have the A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] covered.

[/ QUOTE ]
yea really should have explained that. I think that hands that those hands need to be discounted heavily based on how the hand was played out (capping pre with JQo, not c/r the turn with a flush). though there is only one Ax hand left in the deck for him to have AJ AQ with. maybe not as definite as I first thought, I will have to think about it more

[ QUOTE ]
Not a fan of bet-calling the dumb passive's float at 28:50 with two weak overs.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think you are right. he can have any straight or set here, and him being passive postflop weights his hand range towards those type of hands. ie he might not raise the flop with something like Q7 or A6

[ QUOTE ]
You peel K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] on a 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3-way flop not closing the action. I wouldn't often think to make this peel, but I like your reasoning, and I guess you only need the three king outs and the backdoor for it to show profit.

[/ QUOTE ]
I expect my 9s to often be good vs missblade there. I think a T would likely get c/r on the flop

[ QUOTE ]
At 39:50 with A4o on K55 flop you were mumbling about a hypothetical call somewhere...

[/ QUOTE ]
I'd expect to have the best hand there a lot, very bluff friendly board

[ QUOTE ]
With the 54o at 35:15, I'd fold preflop once the dumb passive pops his option.

[/ QUOTE ]
meh he is very dumb and so is the other dude. getting 5:1 on 1SB I think I can turn a profit there