Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Its not a lose-lose if you are willing to go one step beyond your opponent.
If you both exert the same pressure on each other then yes it will be a wild rollercoaster ride but if you are willing to push just a little harder then you will profit in the long run.
(Edit: There will be a lot of variance in the middle but that is why we have big BRs amirite?)
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes- you will profit in the reg Vs reg battles IF you're good enough and prepared to put in the time and effort, but at what greater expense?
I suspect most of the regs who like to get over-involved with other regs may show a profit in those battles, but overall their win-rate is lower than the more sensible regs.
[/ QUOTE ]
no, especially if they play taggish. DUCY?
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, according to a now near-1,000,000 hand sample of $1/2 it appears to be true of the Full Tilt tables. (I posted a 800k sample of the biggest winners a short while ago on this thread- as Acevadar mentioned above.)
You play 1000NL right? There is clearly such a vast difference in the make-up of the table in terms of players' ability and experience that optimal strategy between these stakes must differ immensely.
|