[Voltaire]

"Accordingly, we reviewed each and every hand that this player played during the relevant time period and determined that while the play was extremely aggressive, particularly on the river, there were several instances where the player merely called on the river. Thus, the allegation that the player accounts at issue “never called on the river, they either raised or folded” are also without merit."

What needs to be explained is how the player was able to NEVER lose money on a river bet. The fact that he just called sometimes doesn't address that.

Also the vagueness about how many hands are in question is troubling. You need to be specific about the number of hands, because that affects the probability of deciding whether the player was just lucky or godlike. We need to know many times he NEVER lost money on the river. If it was ten times, well then perhaps this guy got very, very lucky. It was a hundred times, luck was not involved.