[ghostface]

[ QUOTE ]
in seriousness does this have anything to do w/ banning assani fisher for no real reason?

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I posted this in the SMP forum, but I'm not sure if its really math, so I figure here might be a better spot...

was going to hold out on posting this for a while, but TannerBoyle's thread got me excited to post it. I consider this one of my best works. Although the similarities to Antebellum's corrections are certainly present, I think you'll see that I definitely distinguish myself.

Mayshaque originally posted what many consider to be one of the finest 101 man onslaughts in his first group of essays. Not to sound too conceited, but while his work was revolutionary at the time, it did have flaws and I think I have actually improved upon his work. I'll give a simple and more in depth explanation...

Simple explanation of my work: Mayshaque never took Borak's Retaliation into consideration. Yes that might be a minor issue to some, but when we're talking about some of the most acclaimed onslaughts of all time, every little detail matters.

In depth explanation: The 8 is a simplified mod in this attack. I shored up the mod 8 by including a 9 group surrounding it. The reason that 8, as a simplified mod(or any mod for that matter) needs such protection is because when you're going to move to a full out recon in the end, then you can't have a defeated mod. Safety needs to come first this early....Mayshaque underestimated this imo. Secondly, I completely revamped Mayshaque's mid-late act. I don't know where to begin here, but I think that Mayshaque was just wrong in thinking that he could group together 4 semi fullrites without some minor backlash from Borak's Retaliation. I know that its ballsy to critisize a legend like that, but I really feel strongly about this. I did a few minor adjustments to 3, 16, and 21, but I won't go into too much detail there. I'm sure you'll see that I applied Brian to 99, which even the strongest Mayshaque supporters would concede. The only other move of note is my dealings with #44. I'll actually play a little game with you all here(this will be a nice little quiz for many of you beginners): Can you tell why I adjusted #44 in the way I did? Over than that, everything else should be pretty evident. Feel free to post comments. I'm really proud of this work, as I consider it one of my finest...


1
4 5 7




9 9 9

9 9 8 9 9








10 9 9




12 21 22
11 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

14


15 16
17
18
19
20



2 14
14 3 44
















23
24
25 26 27 28 29 30










31







32
32
32
40
32
32
32
32
32 33
32
32
32


34 35 36 37 38

101

39


42
41 44
43
46 45
47 47 48 49 50 51

55 54

56
53
52

57
58

59 60 61 66 62 63 64 63 65 67 36





68

69 70 70

71 71 72 73






74 74 75 76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83

4

84
4
85 88 86

87 85 89 90 90 91






92 92 93 94 95 96

97 98


99 100

[/ QUOTE ]