View Single Post
  #34  
Old 05-02-2007, 11:08 AM
Dr1Gonzo Dr1Gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bat Country
Posts: 923
Default Re: \"True M\" vs. Harrington\'s M: Critical Flaws in Harrington\'s M Theo

[ QUOTE ]

(ie, small pairs go down in value in the yellow/orange zone because you can't play them for set value).


[/ QUOTE ]
allegedly! You can of course bring implied odds into this and say you can always call with a small pair assuming it is for only an eigth of your stack.
I suppose that's besides the point though.

If no alternative has been offered to calculating M or an efficient way of doing this at the table then it's effectively business as usual. Some people use M to tell them when to get aggressive, others just play aggressively anyway.
Reply With Quote