Re: Strange hand vs CTS
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
care to explain this a bit further? the 0ev proposition.
[/ QUOTE ]
The EV of folding is always zero. By folding, you do not expect to gain or lose anything. Folding can still be a bad EV-play if EV(Call)>0, and this is where the confusion arises.
If you decided EV(Call)=+100, then you do lose 100 by folding, but the EV of folding is not negative, it's still zero.
[/ QUOTE ]
Technically so would betting 2100 and folding for 100 more. Doesn't mean we should analyze the hand that way
|