[fraac]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
My last post touches on those types of concepts, and we'll have a lot to say about that in Volume Two.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sorry, that won't do. If your book is bunk, I want to know now, not after Volume 2.

[/ QUOTE ]

The book is not bunk, no matter what side of any rational debate you're on. Productive discussion revolves around examples, styles and where to draw "the line" in different scenarios. The fundamental concepts of SPR are no more bunk than pot odds or stack sizes are bunk. Those things can't be bunk because they exist, and understanding them can only help your game.

[/ QUOTE ]
Pot odds can determine your play, unexploitably. You call all-in or you don't. This discussion is about whether SPR is useful and in what way. It's interesting and I want to hear more, specifically about application.