View Single Post
  #45  
Old 08-29-2007, 03:20 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: US Department of Justice forces people to buy Microsoft Windows

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Oh, now there IS a difference? Which is it?

[/ QUOTE ]

There is a difference between private and public goods, never said otherwise.

[/ QUOTE ]

But you said there was no differece between tangible and intangible property.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
LOL. Government cannot eliminate or reduce transaction costs. It simply shifts them, transfers them, and masks them.

[/ QUOTE ]

In fact they can.

[/ QUOTE ]

Assert your way to victory! How does this magic occur, exactly?

[ QUOTE ]
As for Coase, he himself explicitly recognized and pointed out cases of private production of so-called "public" goods.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you read my previous post I'm aware of those cases. It's like pointing out that there are theoretical cases in which the government can work efficiently and create a first best world even the market mechanism couldn't achieve.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have no idea what you're trying to say here. What does an expose of supposed public goods being effectively provided by private means have to do with creating a "first best world" (whatver that is) where central planners magically outperform the market? If anything, it's the exact opposite.

[ QUOTE ]
Still, are you aware of the effect of transaction cost on your AC society?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes and no. I advocate no particular society, so it's impossible to predict what transaction costs will be. But regardless, you seem to be willfully ignoring the transaction costs in your statist society.
Reply With Quote