Thread: Ethics Question
View Single Post
  #19  
Old 10-15-2006, 05:56 PM
FortunaMaximus FortunaMaximus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Golden Horseshoe
Posts: 6,606
Default Re: Ethics Question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lol.

Make no distinctions, accept no bribes, send everybody to war. In the end, the side's probability of winning the war goes up, and because its forces will have larger numbers, they also have the probability of fewer losses overall and on ratio.

If this individual sends nobody to war, the chances of the side winning gets hampered, and the likelihood of forces being massacred or routed, and on ratio will be far higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

First off if there is no none going to war than no dies.
Second i would focus on technology over man power (example Isreal)

[/ QUOTE ]

Israel Defense Forces

'fraid I'm gonna have to disagree with your example there. If you won't go to the war, they'll just take you over. Or you'll get fired and they won't find a bleeding heart for the position.
Reply With Quote