[jjb108]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
NL100 is a lot fishier for me than NL50 was.

[/ QUOTE ]

I kind of agree with this. Maybe I was just running poorly, but I thought NL50 was a bit rockish. I cant really think of any reason why this would be so, but thats the general impression I came away from the 50s with.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm feel exactly the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmmmm....

I'm finding the $25's harder than $50's for this kind of reason.



[/ QUOTE ]

I couldn't disagree more with all of this. I agree with 4_2_it that if you can beat the 50's you can beat the 100's.

But if you're feeling like the 25's are harder than the 50's or the 50's are harder than the 100's, I'm shocked. Either you ran hot at the higher level or have poor table selection at the lower level.

Go back to Fim's post on when to move up. I'm not seeing jump straight to the 100's then work your way back down the 25's then jump to the 400's.

I make some awful and donkish plays sometimes but the 25's are full of new and horrible players. You run into a higher percentage of good players the higher you go IMO.