View Single Post
  #243  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:42 AM
Vyse Vyse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: not tipping
Posts: 4,218
Default Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***

[ QUOTE ]

If you want to argue Dukes' ceiling is as high as Young, I still won't listen.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're an open-minded one. I still don't know why I take you half-seriously.

[ QUOTE ]
To say his performance warrants a better projection is lunacy!

[/ QUOTE ]

Stop making up things, no one said any such thing.

[ QUOTE ]

Same can be said for the starting pitcher

[/ QUOTE ]

Except it can't

[ QUOTE ]
I wonder if you were here back then. No, the Rangers did not destroy that trade. They took the player with the lower ceiling, lower floor, and thus lower EV.

[/ QUOTE ]

The BP articles sum up how badly the Rangers raped that trade. lol @ you thinking only extreme outcomes matter. I can get the lower ceiling AND lower floor player and still rape you in a trade simply because my player's average outcom is much higher and that's what is more likely.

[ QUOTE ]

It can tick for two more years before we even need to begin to worry.

[/ QUOTE ]

You apparently don't know the meaning of the word top prospect.

[ QUOTE ]
Young's track record isn't sustained?

[/ QUOTE ]

Two mediocre years in a row = no.

[ QUOTE ]
What does he not have in his favor now?

[/ QUOTE ]

"Two mediocre years in a row..."

[ QUOTE ]
Delmon's performance speaks of a star in the making regardless of his scouting reports.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

No plate discipline = missing a tool = um you're not good.

Maybe he gets it. Maybe he doesn't. Unlikely, though; even if he "gets" it, Young is never going to have a .400 OBP. There are a million potential corner OFs with .300/.350/.500 lines.
Reply With Quote