View Single Post
  #19  
Old 09-14-2007, 04:48 PM
RikaKazak RikaKazak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Absolute Poker:hacker\'s paradise
Posts: 5,535
Default Re: 400NL: AQ OOP on A high board vs aggression

[ QUOTE ]
Several people have suggested I should have 3-bet OOP PF. Let's play out the 3-bet scenario.

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $2/$4 Blinds - 8 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

Hero (SB): $360.80
BB: $931.20
UTG: $453.60
UTG+1: $406.00
MP1: $398.00
MP2: $532.80
CO: $411.70
BTN: $104.70

Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (8 Players)
4 folds, <font color="red">CO raises to $16.00</font>, BTN folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $48.00</font>, Let's assume BB folds and Villain calls the $32 here but that I would have folded to a reraise by Villain. Agree/Disagree?

Pre-flop pot size: $100
Hero's stack size is now: $312.8

With the 3-bet PF line I'm surely going to bet any flop, right? Let's say I bet 2/3 of the pot into Villain. Agree/Disagree?

Flop: ($100) Any Three Cards (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $67</font> leaving $245.8 behind. Villain ?

At this point I'm committed if I've got top pair or better. Otherwise I fold to a raise and shutdown after a call by Villain. Agree/Disagree?

[/ QUOTE ]

c-betting frequencies after 3 betting is way more complicated than this imo...it's the one big hole I see time after time again (and it's one of my bigger holes imo)
Reply With Quote