[blackize]

[ QUOTE ]

1) there was a person who started tilting ... said "wait" .. left ... came back ... played like a god.
2) there was a person that gained FULL hand-history log for a tourney. No way you can prove something without this.

[/ QUOTE ]

We figured out there was cheating going on well before the full hand history log came out. So STFU if you don't know what you're talking about you filthy republican.

[ QUOTE ]

Quote:
in case you missed it, it was the river aggression factor that highlighted a few of the cheating accounts at AP


no it wasn't. You are like republicans: know nothing but who cares whan it cas support their interests.

1) there was a person who started tilting ... said "wait" .. left ... came back ... played like a god.
2) there was a person that gained FULL hand-history log for a tourney. No way you can prove something without this.


Quote:
it was the large pattern of identical stats at FTP that highlighted the bots


as you said. The regulars have enough stats. They can find it. So you can if you play a lot.
And if you don't why do you care?

You want to datamine because of post-analyzes, don't you?
You don't want to datamine because of "hell what he check-raised river means", do you?

Quote:
players found it, not the site


AFAIK Pokerstars is the one of the sites that really search for bots.

[/ QUOTE ]

The regulars do not have enough hands to spot these things. It took hundreds of thousands of hands on each player to out the FT bots. This was only able to be done with the help of dataminers.

[ QUOTE ]

You want to datamine because of post-analyzes, don't you?
You don't want to datamine because of "hell what he check-raised river means", do you?

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you speak english? I can barely decipher your [censored].

Datamined hands really aren't that valuable for figuring out what a river checkraise means from a specific opponent unless you think that dataminers are going through all their hands individually(they aren't).