Re: 200/400 NL - Overbet = Nuts?
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1 looks like a bluff. You're really only representing 66 or air, but you'd probably try to actually get some value with 66.
The bluff looks much better on hand 2, but there doesn't seem to be any reason to shove the turn. Betting $140 accomplishes exactly the same thing since there's almost no hands that call $140 but fold to the shove. If he has top pair then he's stacking, if he has QQ or whatever then he's folding for $140 or the shove.
[/ QUOTE ]
In Hand 1, no [censored] way I'd check behind AK/AQ/random 7, and pushing is ok. His hand looks a hell of a lot like AT/AJ/etc.
In Hand 2, if I had some very good hand that I wanted to bet to protect/for value, I'd push as well; betting 2/3 or 3/4 leaves you with dumb stack sizes.
Whether or not villain knows this/thinks on this level is way more important any other read.
|