[tpir]

[ QUOTE ]
Try to debate someone who can scientifically backup his faith in scriptures is a whole different things.

[/ QUOTE ]
What does this even mean? How can you have scientific backup for faith? Wouldn't that take the "faith" out of the faith realm once we had evidence? Sounds like you mean "trust" and are using the hot-word faith in it's place.


[ QUOTE ]
Obviously we can't understand things though that require no limit to space and time, and obviously we are bound by both.

[/ QUOTE ]
You could not possibly know that either of these statements are true.


[ QUOTE ]
Whole point is to be logical and rational enough to see how science upholds writings in some scriptures

[/ QUOTE ]
Science "upholds" the writing in Moby Dick and War and Peace too. I don't think I see what point you are making here.


[ QUOTE ]
It's only human though, your bound by the same laws as me in our capacity to fully understand the mysteries of the universe. But the things we can understand, if you seek for the truths with an open mind you got a better shot of seeing the brilliant light that started this whole universe.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with you that humans are bounded by certain limitations in understanding the universe. Kind of ironic though that you chastize people for being arrogant but at the same time, you know the truth already!!


[ QUOTE ]
It's a good thing that you don't put yourself in a conversation with people who have logical reasoning for believing in the scriptures thats scientifically backed up.

[/ QUOTE ]
Are you one of these people? If so you should start a new thread about logical reasoning for scripture being true and let us ask you questions. There are lots of reasonable non-believers on here who would have plenty of good questions for you to tackle.