Re: explosion of coaching site spam and the fact? that mods are involv
If you give people the opportunity to buy reasonably priced advertising, they will spend more time posting content and less time finding creative ways to insert their product into their posts. I suggest the following:
Anything that is currently allowed would continued to be allowed. Anything not allowed would be governed by:
$100/month: Any avatar you want that isn't obscene or clearly scamy
$50/month: Any location you want that isn't obscene or clearly scamy
No flashing or overly distracting avatars (at admin/mod discretion)
An admin then posts the names in a thread here or ATF, which can be easily searched by anyone that wants to check.
This way 2+2 taps a large market of users that would like to advertise on 2+2 but can not because it's too expensive. Such a strategy also gives incentive to posters to post high content material that would otherwise be posted on third party sites or not at all.
Avatars and locations are not clickable and, therefore, are not likely to cannibalize existing ad revenue. Some posters will not like ad avatars, but they have many options to block them including blocking them individually and turning off avatars.
|