Re: Final table floor decision
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
2) Since there has been absolutely no action after his all-in I see no real harm in returning his entire bet.
[/ QUOTE ]
It doesn't matter that's there's been no action after. He called two other all-in bets. You're possibly depriving those two players of his chips that they would have won.
Also, since it's a tournament, you're affecting all other players since seat 10 may have more chips than he would have had if he lost the hand.
[/ QUOTE ]
Lets say that the dealer had mucked the cards before the player declared he was all-in. Those players are still deprived of the chance to win the chips.
There is totally fair way to solve this problem, but treating it as though the muck came first seems to be reasonable solution in this scenario
|