View Single Post
  #40  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:22 PM
jeffnc jeffnc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,631
Default Re: Tanenbaum or Stox?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As for small stakes, just get SSHE.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is bad advice in general, and it points out the basic problem with this book and its readers.

You do not want SSHE for small stakes games, you want SSHE for loose games against bad players.

[/ QUOTE ]

B&M

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, pretty much always as it turns out. The point I was making though is that we should stop talking about attributes that aren't important. (Granted, the book does this too. The title has "Small Stakes" in it, when actually that has nothing to do with it.) Technically B&M has nothing to do with it either, although conditions are almost always right there for low limits.

The attibutes you're looking for are loose opponents who go too far with their hands. Online/BM doesn't matter, high/low limits doesn't matter.
Reply With Quote