Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
until someone proves to me otherwise, the cops initially put their hands on the man for free speeching, in an open forum, too loud...(and really [censored] annoyingly)
[/ QUOTE ]
The event was probably organized like this.
1) Get in line to use the mic.
2) Ask a question, any question.
3) Wait for answer.
4) If you're lucky, ask a follow-up question.
5) Sit the [censored] down and let someone else have their turn.
Any one of the event organizers could have (and probably did) ask the cops to remove him once he'd said his piece and gotten his answer. Free speech doesn't mean I have to be forced to listen, nor does it mean you have the right to keep talking after it's someone else's turn.
[/ QUOTE ]
i've been to a few of these things set up exactly the same way. one was for the son of whichever native iraqi was running iraq under president bush. i could see a situation where this kid is flagged (i know for a fact the same type of kids are flagged at my school) for these type of scenarios. i could definitely see the cops waiting for him to [censored] up and cause a scene. i didn't see anyone ask him to calm down.
kerry should of not been a little bitch (oh wait llllllllllllolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllll) and been like, stfu hippy scum i'll answer your first question then you can ask me your other questions you're obviously getting a boner off doing this.
|