How can someone that is so successful be so defensive about something that is so glaringly true?
Apparently, the debate in Nate's thread boils down to Mason saying that he cares a lot about the editing and Nate saying that it doesn't show/seem like it. And Nate was civil about it. Is that really worth a ban, temp or otherwise?
I can't see how it should be, especially considering Nate's contribution to the 2p2 community. Just recently, I (a worthless lurker) made a post in B&M about a spread-limit game I am learning.
Nate offered, and followed through on said offer, to give me advice on the game, hands, etc.
Had enough? We have enough trolls, lurkers, etc. We don't have enough people like Nate!