View Single Post
  #41  
Old 01-06-2007, 12:50 AM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Who is Fistface?
Posts: 27,473
Default Re: A History of Violence

I honestly think this movie is being misunderstood. It wasn't about action, but about character, how far people have to go to be accepted, and if it's even possible in the first place. And it's about taking chances and whether it's worth it.

It was wrapped in the trappings of violence, but hey, violence sells. And some of it was pretty darn good. But if you go to this as an action movie, it's a mistake. This is a David Cronenberg movie. In another movie, he started out making a film about the Doublemint Twins and wound up with Jekyll and Hyde sexually sadistic doppleganger identical twin gynecologists. WTF? This guy is always making weird, taboo gambits wrapped in warped sex and violence. Unfortunately, people were probably led to expect something both quite different and, on an action flick level, something frankly a bit better.

This isn't one of Cronenberg's triumphs, but he misses the mark more than hits it. As does horror in general, which he is usually tied to and is generally known for. The movie doesn't work that well in a good number of ways, like the usual Cronenberg, but I don't think he was ever truly trying for what he is being held accountable for here. It's really likely that Cronenberg can't even make the kind of film he wants to in Hollywood -- if he ever truly nails it down and figures out exactly what it is in the first place. So here he has tried to commercialize his obsessions and the usual rawness of his feelings, and it fails, at least in large part, because he and his subject matter don't really fit into popcorn cinema at all. Any film like this is kind of an attempt to salvage itself before it has even set sail.

He's unlikely to ever be great at being anything other than Cronenberg, and mainstream cinema doesn't really have a place for where he wants to go. I think we're bound to be disappointed, and misunderstand what his movies are really going for, if we go to his very commercially-oriented movies. That's a shame, because he winds up compromising where he wants to go and what viewers of both his personal films and action films can expect.

I guess I'd rather see this film as an interesting variation on the theme: David Cronenberg than as what it was marketed as, a variation on a standard action flick. There are parts of it that deliver much better as Cronenberg than any of the rest of it delivers as action. It's a shame we had to sit through the rest of the action flick to get there, and that people who aren't really interested in Cronenberg's schtick found themselves unexpectedly dragged in for the ride.
Reply With Quote