View Single Post
  #49  
Old 11-30-2007, 09:14 PM
psandman psandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 2,346
Default Re: you are right, it\'s a ridiculous arguement

your wrong about this.

An all-In Raise that is not sufficient to constitute a full raise is not a nullity that didn't occur. Its action. you don't pretned its not there or othjer players wouldn't have to call it to continue in the hand.

Since you reference Robert's rules but were to lazy to look them up (your picking up bad habits) I will

[ QUOTE ]
2. The minimum bet size is the amount of the minimum bring-in, unless the player is going all-in. The minimum bring-in is the size of the big blind unless the structure of the game is preset by the house to some other amount (such as double the big blind). The minimum bet remains the same amount on all betting rounds. If the big blind does not have sufficient chips to post the required amount, a player who enters the pot on the initial betting round is still required to enter for at least the minimum bet (unless going all-in for a lesser sum) and a preflop raiser must at least double the size of the big blind. At all other times, when someone goes all-in for less than the minimum bet, a player has the option of just calling the all-in amount. If a player goes all-in for an amount that is less than the minimum bet, a player who wishes to raise must raise at least the amount of the minimum bet. For example, if the minimum bet is $100, and a player goes all-in on the flop for $20, a player may fold, call $20, or raise to at least a total of $120

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
5. “Completing the bet” is a limit poker wager type only, not allowed at big-bet poker.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote