Re: Now THAT\'S a defense attorney (aka, \"How was this shmuck not guilt
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ummmmm, so?
Isn't it possible that the man is actually innocent and that the prosecution had a weak case based on not much more than the accused's criminal history?
[/ QUOTE ]
yeah its possible, but come on. The guy is already a convicted pedophile, hes got an underground bunker he keeps drugs in and hes having sex with 17 year old girls, I mean lets just play the odds here [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
Three strikes. Besides he should still be locked up for the 91 molestation. [censored] drug laws filling up prisons lets the real trash like him out. 15 years for what he did is just wrong.
J
|