[trixtrix]

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe you'd like to say why you think I'm wrong in everything I've said in this thread instead of what you just did.

[/ QUOTE ]

no, not maybe, you're wrong

[ QUOTE ]
ooo a Chuck fanboy has arrived.

[/ QUOTE ]

where?

[ QUOTE ]
Chuck's weakness is strikers which is why he has been fed grappler after grappler.

[/ QUOTE ]

what exactly is overeem, metzger, belfort, suloev etc.. genius?

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe you'd like to say why you think I'm wrong in everything I've said in this thread instead of what you just did.

[/ QUOTE ]

i didn't think i need stress something plainly self-evident to you, but apparently i do.. so fine


[ QUOTE ]
Houston: He'd KO Liddell and Dana does not want Chuck to lose 2 in a row.

[/ QUOTE ]

uh yea okay, houston is gonna ko chuck via what? your imagination? the same guy who charged in and got dropped to a knee by one of jardine's slapping wrist punches? what do you think one of liddell's overhand right which ko'd iron-chined fighters like randy/horn/tito etc is going to do to him?

houston also did most of his damage after jardine got lazy w/ him in the clinch and got uppercuted to death.. do you really think w/ chuck's footwork which eluded good greco-roman wrestlers such as randy and babalu who lived off the clinch that houston is actually going to get that close?

houston isn't fighting chuck at this stage b/c he doesn't deserve it. this is the same houston who lost to medina, a 16-10 fighter who got ko'd by trigg/gideon ray/derrick noble. in fact, aside from the jardine fight, the opponents he has beaten has a combined record of (34-78), but somehow in all of a one fight which he was almost ko'd initially you're convinced he'd fu-k chuck? okay..

so explain if jardine doesn't DESERVE a fight w/ chuck w/ a much better record, then why does houston deserve one again?

[ QUOTE ]
2 fighters that just got KTFO easily should not be a main event.

[/ QUOTE ]

so by your brilliant logic, the likes of gsp/hughes/crocop/franklin etc doesn't deserve to be the main event ever either b/c they were ko'd in one of their fights?

way to go hoss, so who is left that DO deserve to be in the main event then? matt serra and chris lytle?

ktfo so easily?? you do realize chuck was simply unlucky/underprepared that day right? you make it sound like chuck has a fragile chin and gets routinely put lights-out. aside from his previous fight, can you show me another instance of him being put down by a one-shot ko? go ahead.. i'm waiting.


[ QUOTE ]
If he gets a title shot after the win I'd also be really pissed.


[/ QUOTE ]

really? okay mmaster, who do YOU think deserves a title shot if not the guy who successfully defended the championship belt 5 straight times after he wins a fight against a top 5 division contender?

shogun? wandy? what exactly have they done in the ufc to justify the title-shot if chuck doesn't "deserve" it? combined they have ZERO fights in ufc but apparently they deserve it more than the 6 time lhw titleholder who also have 2 wins over the current hw champ? outrageously humourous..

who else is left then? lambert can't beat rashad. rashad can't beat tito and don't deserve a shot until he does.. tito can't beat stamina. forest and gouveia can't beat jardine.. bisping and machida you can barely make a case for, but i don't see why they deserve it anymore than chuck after winning 2 straight against semi-mediocre competition (in bisping's case) and unimpressively (machida's case). so you tell me hoss: WHO "DESERVES" a title-shot if chuck doesn't if he wins against jardine?

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe I'm wrong and maybe I'm right. My past performance has told me that I'm right more often than I'm wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

no, your past posting performance indicated that you're wrong.. period