[ QUOTE ]
I cant see the point of this.
The difference is so small its insignificant.
[/ QUOTE ]
The point is that the difference is so small it is insignificant.
Yet many sources go out of their way to state that there is a significant difference in these hands. I am just trying to correct an inaccuracy that is widely stated in the Omaha literature and occasionally on this forum. Isn't that the mantra of the founders of this forum, lol.
Here are a few recent threads on 2+2 that discuss these types of hands but as I said before you will find the same in the work of Slotboom, Ciaffone, Stewart, and others:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...rt=all&vc=1
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...rue#Post8514221
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post10374914
The issue isn't a big one but if I simply said it wasn't so (as many authors have simply said it is so) I don't think it would have been as convincing.
Patty