Re: Now THAT\'S a defense attorney (aka, \"How was this shmuck not guilt
[ QUOTE ]
Wow, i hope you are all being sarcastic.
There is a high chance the dude didnt do it. The reason they dont mention prior convictions is because it prejudices the jury, just like it has prejudiced you.
12 men and woman, good and true, listened to ALL the evidence and came back not guilty. How can you possibly judge when you have listened to litterally none of the evidence?
[/ QUOTE ]
all it takes is a little chance that he didn't do it
|