Re: the proof is in the pudding
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i see what you're saying badbeat, but when post-oak put up his challenge, it IMMEDIATELY showed that cato-tonia was full of crap with his 60% claim. even someone who is new to sports betting knows that money talks. offering a bet and/or seeing it get turned down is a more convincing argument than any amount of replying back and forth.
[/ QUOTE ]
Also, saying people don't make stupid bets here is false. Happens every month if not far more.
[/ QUOTE ]
I propped someone on a Kubiak projection rounding up on receptions and yards. Then additionally citing they had to pass all three standards in Recptions/Yards/TDs. Even money. Its like someone took lessons from Durrrr on how to prop.
|