[Synergistic Explosions]

[ QUOTE ]
I just assumed this was the case, but it seems that some people do not understand it.

There's some rule that the tribe must own the companies operating the gaming operations. Thus, they own the brand.

Meanwhile, the people who own the real assets of AP - the systems, the employees, the databases, the IP, etc - are someone else.


Please stop claiming that the tribe chief owns AP. He does not own AP in the meaningful sense that any casual reader would take that claim to mean.

[/ QUOTE ]

So the letter that Chief Joe Norton wrote to the public about how they caught the high level consultant and were going to clean up the mess was a letter from someone not in a high position at AP? He wrote the letter to the public saying he was going to correct matters, but in essence he isn't in any position to do the things he claimed?

Sorry if this is redundant, I just assumed he had some pull from that letter. But you are actually saying he is only the owner on paper, but doesn't control the assets involved, and probably doesn't have any power to correct matters?

So if the owner of AP can't change things, who actually is in power there that has committed to changing things, the things Chief Norton mentioned in his first letter to the public?