Re: What I Would Like to See From the PPA (and 2+2)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nelson Rose is a terrible choice, in my opinion. He has no reason to fight for poker players.
[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree. Show me your reasons why. A blind statement like that is pointless without facts to back it up.
[/ QUOTE ]
What interest does he have in poker? He's a gambling law professor with his own business that runs deep into all forms of gambling. he has no vested interest in poker specifically.
If anything, he would more likely be against a specific carveout for personal and business reasons.
[/ QUOTE ]
You need to investigate him some more, he is pro carve out and he has argued that as written the existing law is doomed.
TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
Again, he has no reason to fight for it other than taking a paycheck. He's not harmed at all by the implementation of the law, nor the enforcement of the law. His business goes on. That might be okay when you need someone doing the dirty work like Senator Pothole, but it doesn't make for a viable long-term plan.
|