View Single Post
  #16  
Old 08-09-2007, 02:35 PM
Yeti Yeti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,332
Default Re: FAO MH - re: Melchiades

i didn't think the ban was 'unfair'. i was as close to certain as possible that it was DEAD WRONG. there is a huge difference there.

when a long-time strategy poster messages me saying 'dude wtf i have been banned for spamming, i am not even an affiliate, no clue what this is about, some dude pm'ed me party rb spam earlier today and now this happens', you can be pretty sure there has been misunderstanding.

i have no idea why you think i am against protocol in general. i just don't think it applies in this exact circumstance!

here's an example. lets say tonight i get drunk and permban anacardo and place in the notes 'FU ANACARDO YOU POST SUCH LONG RAMBLING EMO NONSENSE FU FU FU I HATE YOU'. you are saying that this should remain in the notes for eternity even after he is quickly unbanned? what sense does that even make? you might as well add into my notes that i won the egg and spoon race back in 91 because it holds about as much relevance.
Reply With Quote