Re: Read the brief, nice background \"facts\" , but procedural quagmire
OK, the website in the original post had a link to the brief that was filed. I'll read it and post again tonight. Substantively, we need a Constitutional lawyer to opine on the merits of the case, which is an action grounded in First Amendment rights. I can probably help out tonight with procedural and other questions, but I'm no First Amendment maven.
|