Re: Absolute Does Not Respond to Two Plus Two’s Fraud Investigation O
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Second, Absolute has apparently agreed to allow Bluff Magazine and Pocket Fives to review the findings of the investigation without a similar arrangement for Two Plus Two. This seems strange considering Two Plus Two’s role in uncovering and discussing this situation.
[/ QUOTE ]
It's kind of funny how when Nat was considering whether to go down to Costa Rica "as a representative for twoplustwo", Mason was very quick to point out that "I'm sorry but you do not represent Two Plus Two. That authorization can only from me."
However, when it comes to taking credit for uncovering the scandal, he's happy to have all the credit associated with the "Two Plus Two" name.
[/ QUOTE ]
QFT
[/ QUOTE ]
FYP
Don't have anything against Mason, but he did make sure 2+2, the company, was prominent in his post, and it was a bit overstated. I can't seem to find any other reason for his posting, unless this is laying ground work before yanking all Absolute adverts.
[/ QUOTE ]
I find your and the majority of posts in this subject irrelevant, nitpicking and unfairly speculative. I can't find any reason why people that want to investigate Absolute Poker would go around anxiously asking themself if they are worthy. Just do it, dammit.
Mason clearly states that he has an interest in "the fair play of the game". If you are not able to find this among the reasons, we do have a problem. But I am quite sure you and the other posters of these speculations are a minority.
|