[Berge20]

CMAR, that's definately where I was 6-months ago...heck, maybe even 3.

I'm starting to buy into the argument that even if quantity doesn't merit a change, perhaps quality does. Realizing that people can give quality advice now, should they choose, I see a lot of people making comments and not discussing them. This goes both ways, with low-stakes players giving their two cents on a NL200 hand w/o grasping concepts and a NL200 regular commenting on a NL25 hand of "get it all in!"

Our goal, regardless of how, should be to facilitate good, high quality discussion on hands. How we get there, I'm not entirely sure. Is splitting one way to try and improve quality? Arguably, yes.

We have strategy forums with significantly less traffic (all the limit and other games) and while FR NL/PL is certainly not out of control, in terms of post counts/views--I don't fully agree that splitting it will let it rot on the vine. In some ways, doing a little pruning might be best for things in the longrun.

I'm coming around to the concept of at least giving it a shot.

Fully agree it has to be: NL50 and below, NL100 and up