View Single Post
  #32  
Old 07-31-2007, 08:22 AM
BigPoppa BigPoppa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mid-Life Crisis
Posts: 3,614
Default Re: $200 NL - I Suck at Three Bet Pots?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


On the flop, I suggest betting more because I think your fold equity is slightly higher if you raise ~$10 more, it looks stronger, this is what you want when you have air in a big pot.

However, if your read says he will fold for less, by all means bet less.

[/ QUOTE ]

STatements like this put me on tilt.

We don't WANT fold equity. Fold equity!? Vs. what? A Queen?

Ya, right, GL w/that.

You want villain to CALL if you bet this flop. Otherwise, betting is retarded.

[/ QUOTE ]

Assuming you c/c flop for 30ish, what is your plan for the rest of the hand assuming no A/K shows. Are you willing to play a big pot unimproved readless here or would you simply give villain's range credit and fold to a bet on the turn?

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably c/f the turn. Depends on reads, flow, etc. An A or K on the turn doesn't matter much, tbh, because I think AK takes a free card here a lot.

In my experience, the flop checks through here a lot. Then I bet the turn 2/3 pot, and a hand like 99 calls. Then the river goes check/check (which makes me think, by the way, that I am missing some river value in hands like this, but meh, sometimes it goes check-check and he shows QJ).

Against some villains I WILL bet here, but not because I want them to fold. If I bet here, it's purely for value.

[/ QUOTE ]

Great post and great reasoning behind it.
Reply With Quote