Thread: four hands
View Single Post
  #18  
Old 10-18-2007, 04:57 PM
nath nath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tone
Posts: 22,162
Default Re: four hands

Yeah obviously there was history in all of these, it's just more fun to post without the history and look awesome

Hands 3 and 4 were vs bad regulars who love to 3- and 4-bet light and float in reraised pots and generally play them very badly (hence why I jacked it up to $36 in the KJ hand). In hand 4 the villain 4 bet immediately and I thought about making it like $165 and calling a shove because that would have been completely sick but I didn't and then he's so obviously full of [censored] when he checks the flop that I just bet-3-bet the turn and showed. It was probably for value.
Reply With Quote