Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss.
[/ QUOTE ]
10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt.
[/ QUOTE ]
And this proves he isnt the same person how?
[/ QUOTE ]
Proof? Where did I claim to "prove" anything? Even a court of law only requires reasonable doubt. I just gave you plenty of grounds for that. So where's the "proof" that he is in fact Cyrus? Let us see it.
[/ QUOTE ]
Ok Im really not down with getting involved in this drama. I just thought it was ridiculous to use that as proof or even reasonable doubt in the case of a person that was known to have used more than one account. It might raise a hint of doubt but thats about it. As for proving, I really dont care if it is or isnt Cyrus. I could find out pretty easily if I cared since we correspond via email from time to time. But I will enjoy this thread too much to short circuit it at this point in time.
|