Re: Cotto Vs Mosley
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm surprised at some of the pro-Mosley comments here... I've been thinking that Cotto is the side here -> too strong, home 'ring' advantage... etc.
Either way, this one might be as good as the Calzaghe fight last week.
[/ QUOTE ]
I just don't see it...Mosley has the reach, mosley has the speed, mosley has the experience, and mosley has been tested ...
This is one of those times where if Mosley wins, I have serious regret because from what I can tell I'm supposed to bet 10u on him...but i certainly won't put any heavy action on him. Why? I just don't trust my boxing knowledge enough.
[/ QUOTE ]
That was the reason for my bump, all signs point to Shane, and I'm looking for reasons not to take him at +130 if there are any obvious ones I am overlooking. I think he is more of a live dog than Pavlik was. Cotto had issues with Judah and got knocked silly for a while by Torres too. As long as Shane has enough of his "prime" left, I think he can make a bloody mess of Cotto. The guys that beat Shane, Wright and Forrest, are nothing at all like Cotto.
|