Re: Should this trade be allowed or vetoed as collusion?
That trade is beyond atrocious. LT>Parker+Driver+Eli. Massive RB improvement to the top RB in the league, free quality young WR (who's a considerable improvement over Driver).
Though I'd probably approve it in my league unless I had reason to believe there was collusion, I would fully expect to lose one or more owners in the offseason as a result of it. Because of that, I'd probably send both owners a "wtf" e-mail and depending on the reply from the idiot, likely discuss with our league's executive committee to boot him in the offseason for ineptitude. I always prefer to lose clown owners to good ones who are concerned with fairness.
|