[wpr101]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The fact that Kelsitaan plays a very unorthodox style while lacking many fundamental skills and is still [in my opinion] a big winner makes it even more interesting. His style is best against poor-average players and especially weak-tight players, though, and doesn't stand up well against other thinking, aggressive players. I was never claiming he was an amazing player, just that he was one of the biggest winners at full-ring [at least at 3/6.] I agree that he'd have to develop a lot as a player before he could sustain a decent winrate at 6-max.

[/ QUOTE ]

Kelisitaan is pretty bad. I'm up more against him than anymore else. He might be good against the fish though and nits. He plays 40/26 (this is over 8k hands i have with him) at full ring... it's pretty hard to defend his play.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's tightened up some I think to around 30/20 lately. I admire his small ball strategy but I don't let him get away with the constant min raises.

[/ QUOTE ]

His minraises are really annoying. He's not that bad post flop though. His overall gameplan is poor though.