Re: a quick thought
"But you are still coercively imposing your morality upon me if I don't believe in your conception of property rights."
Yes, under your definition. Likewise, if I define 'coercion' as giving taffy to a donkey, you would be practicing coercion by giving taffy to a donkey. The argument FOR property rights, while subtle, is fairly well established by this point. The argument against it, while pervasive and omnipresent has been debunked fairly well (see communist russia, cuba, north korea etc.)
|