[MicroBob]

[ QUOTE ]
Just 2 comments:

1) I don't think playing the same way live proves that you are not running a bot bc if you programmed the bot, you should be able to play like it.

Having said that:
2) I have no idea if you were using a bot or colluding or doing anything fraudulent, but if you were not doing anything wrong, I feel really bad for you because I couldn't imagine not doing anything wrong and then reading those emails. It seems like an uphill battle.

[/ QUOTE ]


agree 100% with both points.

If what the poster says is true then I wouldn't blame some idiot player for accusing you. I would be blaming the FT team for making a bad decision.

The subject-line reads that it was Mr. Gatorade's lies that cost you the money.
Huh? Well, I guess it wouldn't have happened if he hadn't accused you. But it was FT's decision.
They are the ones to blame.

Dumb players make bot or collusion-accusations ALL the time.
The site is supposed to be able to sort out the legit claims from the riff-raff.


I had one player stalk me from table to table because he thought I 'cheated' him heads-up by winning with 65s.
I had raised it preflop and then hit my draw which he thought meant I was cheating.
I was semi-bluff raising with the draw so perhaps he thought that my raising before i had an actual hand meant that I knew I was going to hit my draw or something.

He went from table to table telling people what I had done.
He also said he reported me to support because I was an obvious cheat which I do believe he probably did.

The site never got back to me about it. Hopefully because they were smart enough to see that his accusations were idiotic.