Re: A plea to omgwtfnoway (re the variance thread blowup)
What I understand :
omgwtfnoway says that playing $10 stacks at NL100 is lower variance than $10 stacks at NL10, because the st dev in big blinds will be higher at NL10. It really doesn't make any sense imo and I agree with TNixon you have to think in $ here, that's what is relevant.
Also I'm not sure I understand the point in your calculations where you push at 60% equity different stack sizes, since the deeper the stacks the less often these situations will happen and you have to take this into account.
|