[creedofhubris]

i gave it a c+, mostly due to the fact that what i thought was a great article (the scooping outs in omaha piece) proves to be mathematically flawed, there's nothing here for cash games, and "poker journalism" is not interesting to me as a category.

the poker/investments piece is underdeveloped and it's impossible for this layman to figure out how to apply the concepts the author describes. the negreanu interview was rife with typos.