[bxb]

The fact that they actually took action against a suspected bot has interesting implications in the NL bot case. Somehow there must have been more incriminating evidence in this case than in the other case where most people seem to believe that they were bots.

Also, I don't think programming a bot would teach you to play like it. It may perform calculations that a human would not be able to perform at the table. Also it is possible that a botter could buy a bot instead of programming it. I think the fact that he is willing to play live does give his story some credibility, although I'm still not sure what to think.